The field if it were picked on what teams have earned. Tap a team to run its path in the Playoff Machine.
Ohio State1006-1 · earned +1.11Auto bid2
UCLA986-0 · earned +1.073
BYU936-0 · earned +0.96Auto bid4
Miami876-0 · earned +0.83Auto bid5
Tennessee806-1 · earned +0.67Auto bid6
Kentucky806-1 · earned +0.667
Utah796-0 · earned +0.648
Georgia786-1 · earned +0.639
Texas Tech736-0 · earned +0.5110
Ole Miss725-1 · earned +0.4911
Indiana676-1 · earned +0.3812
James Madison637-0 · earned +0.29Auto bid
Notre Dame 65
Wake Forest 64
Alabama 64
USC 63One row per team still in it. Sort any column. SOS and team ranks are among all 136 FBS teams; the toughest schedule so far belongs to Texas, the softest in our 12 to James Madison.
| # | Team | Worthiness | Record | Earned wins | SOS | SOS left | Ceiling | Team rank | Best win | Worst loss | Make it | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ohio State | 100 | 6-1 | +1.11 | 11 | 2 | +3.04 | 1 | Indiana | Texas | 89% | In |
| 2 | UCLA | 98 | 6-0 | +1.07 | 12 | 15 | +2.59 | 44 | Oregon | – | 35% | In |
| 3 | BYU | 93 | 6-0 | +0.96 | 38 | 50 | +2.53 | 22 | Notre Dame | – | 59% | In |
| 4 | Miami | 87 | 6-0 | +0.83 | 83 | 40 | +2.58 | 4 | Clemson | – | 98% | In |
| 5 | Tennessee | 80 | 6-1 | +0.67 | 25 | 35 | +2.40 | 17 | Alabama | Texas | 33% | In |
| 6 | Kentucky | 80 | 6-1 | +0.66 | 9 | 27 | +2.33 | 48 | Texas A&M | Alabama | 7% | In |
| 7 | Utah | 79 | 6-0 | +0.64 | 34 | 7 | +2.27 | 19 | Iowa State | – | 65% | In |
| 8 | Georgia | 78 | 6-1 | +0.63 | 29 | 31 | +2.36 | 5 | Alabama | Auburn | 86% | In |
| 9 | Texas Tech | 73 | 6-0 | +0.51 | 95 | 60 | +1.95 | 9 | Arizona State | – | 92% | In |
| 10 | Ole Miss | 72 | 5-1 | +0.49 | 7 | 10 | +2.64 | 12 | LSU | Florida | 28% | In |
| 11 | Indiana | 67 | 6-1 | +0.38 | 39 | 47 | +1.92 | 3 | Rutgers | Ohio State | 91% | In |
| 12 | Notre Dame | 65 | 6-1 | +0.33 | 35 | 9 | +1.64 | 2 | Wisconsin | BYU | 97% | Bubble |
| 13 | Wake Forest | 64 | 6-1 | +0.31 | 20 | 68 | +1.40 | 49 | NC State | Miami | 21% | Bubble |
| 14 | Alabama | 64 | 5-2 | +0.30 | 3 | 37 | +1.75 | 8 | Mississippi State | Tennessee | 40% | Bubble |
| 15 | USC | 63 | 6-1 | +0.29 | 10 | 3 | +2.36 | 11 | Penn State | Oregon | 41% | Bubble |
| 16 | Houston | 63 | 6-1 | +0.29 | 47 | 69 | +1.55 | 28 | Kansas State | Texas Tech | 31% | Out |
| 17 | James Madison | 63 | 7-0 | +0.29 | 112 | 107 | +0.78 | 43 | Old Dominion | – | 100% | In |
| 18 | Northwestern | 63 | 5-1 | +0.29 | 57 | 18 | +2.53 | 56 | Penn State | Indiana | 1% | Out |
| 19 | Iowa | 59 | 5-1 | +0.21 | 36 | 64 | +1.61 | 24 | Washington | Ohio State | 26% | Out |
| 20 | Texas | 54 | 4-2 | +0.08 | 2 | 5 | +2.31 | 6 | Ohio State | Florida | 30% | Out |
Ohio State · earned +1.11
UCLA · earned +1.07
BYU · earned +0.96
Miami · earned +0.83
Tennessee · earned +0.67
Kentucky · earned +0.66
Utah · earned +0.64
Georgia · earned +0.63
Texas Tech · earned +0.51
Ole Miss · earned +0.49
Indiana · earned +0.38
James Madison · earned +0.29
Notre Dame · earned +0.33
Wake Forest · earned +0.31
Alabama · earned +0.30
USC · earned +0.29How good each contender is against what it has earned. Top right has done both.

Pick the rest of the season yourself →
A score for what a team has earned toward a College Football Playoff spot, from results and how convincing they were. For every game, we ask how often a playoff-standard team (the 10th-best team in the betting market, +14.6 points on a neutral field) wins that game at that site, using the opponent's betting-market rating today. Then we credit the game by how the team competed: half for the result, half for the margin (a 14-point win is worth 0.9, a one-point win 0.54, a three-point loss 0.38; margins are capped at 24 so running up a score buys nothing). Credit minus expectation, added up over the season, is Earned Wins: wins above what a playoff team would have against the same schedule. The 0 to 100 score is that number scaled so this week's leader is 100 and a team that merely matched the standard is 50.
Because of who they beat and by how much. A comfortable win over a team the market rates at zero earns about 0.1 of a win; a win over a top-five team earns more than half a win; a one-score escape against an FCS team costs. One-loss teams with two or three convincing big wins pass unbeaten teams that have not played anyone yet, and a close loss to the best team in the country costs almost nothing. The ceiling column shows what winning out would earn.
From the betting market. Every FBS game's closing point spread is solved for one rating per team, so the number for an opponent is what the market thinks of them right now, not a preseason guess or a poll. SOS is the average rating of the opponents played; SOS left is the average of the opponents remaining.
The committee ranks by eye and says it weighs record, strength of schedule, head-to-head and conference titles. Worthiness is the record and the schedule, priced, and nothing else. Across 70 committee rankings since 2014, our 12 matched the committee's 12 on 10.7 teams a week on average, against 8.9 for a plain record sort and 11.4 for the AP poll. 35 of the 48 final top-four teams were in our top four the week before. The gap is where the argument is.
The real rule: the five highest-ranked conference champions are in, seven at-large teams fill the field, and all twelve are seeded straight by rank, so the top four get byes and no bye is reserved for a champion. Before the conference title games, a conference's champion is its most worthy team. Champions come from every FBS conference, so a Group of 5 champion with a better resume than a power-conference champion takes the spot. Independents like Notre Dame can only get in at-large.
Every Monday morning in season, after the weekend's games and the market's new prices, through selection Sunday.