New: Be a GM College lets you run your NIL budget, fight the portal, and play the season. Try it. →
FreeBe a GM: College · run your program's NIL budget and rosterRun the program
Recruiting

Find the next big thing

The next Malik Hooker: the 2027 recruits whose offer boards look like his did.

Malik Hooker
Malik Hooker

ATH · Ohio State, class of 2014 · drafted 2017, round 1, No. 15 by Indianapolis

13offers at signing
70strength of his top 3 offers
6-2, 185size as a recruit

The 2027 recruits with boards like his

closest first
Michigan State logoDon Spillers
ATH · Detroit, MI · committed to Michigan State · 20 offers
1 offers from top-25 programs; Hooker had 3; both about 6-2, 195
62match
Tennessee logoDayon Cooper
ATH · South Pittsburg, TN · committed to Tennessee · 15 offers
1 offers from top-25 programs; Hooker had 3; both about 6-1, 185
61match
Cincinnati logoMaalik Moore
ATH · Fort Wayne, IN · committed to Cincinnati · 13 offers
1 offers from top-25 programs; Hooker had 3; both about 6-3, 185
60match
Virginia Tech logoSemaj Dozier
ATH · Pleasantville, NJ · committed to Virginia Tech · 18 offers
1 offers from top-25 programs; Hooker had 3; both about 6-2, 175
59match
Tennessee logoJaden Butler
ATH · Brownsville, TN · committed to Tennessee · 9 offers
9 offers; Hooker had 13; both about 6-1, 190
58match
Matched on position, size, the strength of the programs that offered and how many did: his board at signing day against the 2027 boards today (Nov 2, 2026). The month-by-month cut waits for the dated history, landing now. Recruits are shown with recruiting facts only. History, not a forecast.

Malik's board when he signed with Ohio State

13 offers, strongest first
Virginia Tech logoVirginia TechMichigan logoMichiganArizona logoArizonaOhio State logoOhio StateNebraska logoNebraskaGeorgia Tech logoGeorgia TechTemple logoTempleWest Virginia logoWest VirginiaBuffalo logoBuffaloPenn State logoPenn StatePittsburgh logoPittsburghBoston College logoBoston College
The offers on record for the class of 2014, ordered by program strength as each program stood that year. A count is the offers on record, not every offer the staffs made.